[ietf-dkim] Re: Issue 1382
davidrepking at gmail.com
Tue Oct 17 14:05:04 PDT 2006
> I'd be satisfied if the requirements draft were to say:
> The protocol MUST NOT require use of a new DNS RR type. The protocol MAY
> allow for optional use of a new RR type.
And then nobody will use the new (optional) RR type, if there's an alternative.
IMHO, new types of data MUST require new types of RR
If we would re-use RR types, why don't you wan't arbitrary numeric
values on A records (like telephone numers, extensions, system IDs,
More information about the ietf-dkim