Issue 1382 (was: Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: New resource record type)

[Scott Kitterman]

On Monday 16 October 2006 10:21, Stephen Farrell wrote:

> So I'd suggest that we leave this issue [2] open for now, and come
> back to the topic when we've got a concrete protocol on which we
> can base the discussion.
>
> Does that sound ok for now?
>
If that's the best I can get, OK.

I was serious when I said that if we are going to have to cut and deploy a new 
RR type for SSP we may as well stop now.  By the time that happens the 
internet ecosphere will have routed around the protocol.

>From my perspective a new RR type is a showstopper problem.  I'm not sure what 
a more concrete proposal for a new RR type might do to change that.  

However you want to handle it is fine though,

Scott K