[ietf-dkim] New Issue: New resource record type
lear at cisco.com
Sun Oct 15 13:13:04 PDT 2006
Scott Kitterman wrote:
> This draft mentions the posibility of requiring a new resource record type.
> It isn't clear from the draft if the mention is in reference to the idea of
> using a new RR type in parallel with TXT for some period or if the idea is
> possibly deployment exclusively in the new RR type.
> If it's the latter, I think that this would be an extraordinarily bad idea.
> In my opinion, if this protocol is going to require a new RR type to go
> forward, it will never get deployed.
> Recommend a new requirement that the protocol MUST NOT depend solely on a new
> DNS RR type just so there won't be any confusion on this.
I would suggest that whatever approach SSP uses be consistent with what
has been done with the base protocol.
More information about the ietf-dkim