[ietf-dkim] 1359: ssp-requirements-01 // Outsource First Party Signing concerns extended

[Stephen Farrell]

Damon wrote:
> +1
> 
> I can't attend due to firewall restrictions it seems. (*sigh*)

That's a pity. But this was flagged as heading for closed on Sep 21,
on the list.

> But I think there is plenty of positive concensus on this 

Can you point to any messages sent to the list that support Doug's
position on 1359? I saw none at all (until today).

 > AND
> https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1358 -DKIM Strict-

Again - please point to such messages.

If no-one can show me where I've erred then I'm happy that I
haven't and these therefore remain closed issues.

Stephen.

> 
> Regards,
> Damon Sauer
> 
> 
> On 10/11/06, william(at)elan.net <william at elan.net> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Doug,
>> >
>> > That was agreed to be closed on the jabber session.
>> >
>> > No-one spoke against that, so please consider this closed/rejected.
>>
>> You're quite wrong. Number of people spoke - just not on the jabber.
>> You're abusing jabber as means of making decision for WG items -
>> jabber is just a discussion forum for some group of WG participants
>> but as per IETF rules all decisions are really done based on discussions
>> on the list.
>>
>> ---
>> William Leibzon
>> Elan Networks
>> william at elan.net
>> _______________________________________________
>> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
>> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
>>
>