[ietf-dkim] 1359: ssp-requirements-01 // Outsource First Party Signing concerns extended

[Damon]

+1

 I can't attend due to firewall restrictions it seems. (*sigh*)
But I think there is plenty of positive concensus on this AND
https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1358 -DKIM Strict-

Regards,
Damon Sauer


On 10/11/06, william(at)elan.net <william at elan.net> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>
> >
> > Doug,
> >
> > That was agreed to be closed on the jabber session.
> >
> > No-one spoke against that, so please consider this closed/rejected.
>
> You're quite wrong. Number of people spoke - just not on the jabber.
> You're abusing jabber as means of making decision for WG items -
> jabber is just a discussion forum for some group of WG participants
> but as per IETF rules all decisions are really done based on discussions
> on the list.
>
> ---
> William Leibzon
> Elan Networks
> william at elan.net
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
>