[ietf-dkim] 1359: ssp-requirements-01 // Outsource First Party Signing concerns extended

[Stephen Farrell]

william(at)elan.net wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> 
>>
>> Doug,
>>
>> That was agreed to be closed on the jabber session.
>>
>> No-one spoke against that, so please consider this closed/rejected.
> 
> You're quite wrong. 

If so, apologies. Can you point me at the mail archive please? (I
mean since we discussed this in the jabber session and I posted
the summary.)

 > Number of people spoke - just not on the jabber.
> You're abusing jabber as means of making decision for WG items -

Overstated.

> jabber is just a discussion forum for some group of WG participants
> but as per IETF rules all decisions are really done based on discussions 
> on the list.

Of course,
Stephen.