[ietf-dkim] Jabber session this Thursday 1500 UTC

[Stephen Farrell]

Thanks Eliot,

Unless someone can point at something in the record
contradicting these dispositions please act on them,
say at the end of your Monday.

People can verify Eliot's conclusions, and/or answer Dave's
question themselves by looking through the summaries of the
jabber logs that I sent after each jabber chat.

Stephen.

Eliot Lear wrote:
> Disclaimer: this is really the province of the chairs, but as an
> individual, here is my view:
> 
> Dave Crocker wrote:
>>
>> Eliot Lear wrote:
>>> Many of the issues are awaiting confirmation from the chairs that I
>>> should close them.  In some cases this is due simply to an apparent
>>> consensus on the jabber session that no change should be made, but that
>>> it would be confirmed on the mailing list.
>> Eliot,
>>
>> Thanks for the follow-up and clarification.
>>
>> What items are in need of working group discussion?
>>
> Here is a summary from rt.psg.com and some Eliot commentary
> 
> 1201:  PROPOSED CLOSED && NO FURTHER DISCUSISON
> 1356:  OPEN - no next action listed
> 1357:  Mike to clarify text
> 1358:  PROPOSE REJECT - consensus on jabber not to proceed
> 1359:  PROPOSED CLOSED - long jabber log
> 1360:  OPEN "heading toward close/reject" with discussion on the list
> 1361:  CLOSE/ACCEPT/MOOT since the entire section involved is disappearing
> 1362:  OPEN awaiting resolution of 1357
> 1363:  ACCEPTED, Dave to Assist Mike with text.
> 1364:  ACCEPT - Mike to confirm that this area is covered.  Probably an
> email to the list is in order.
> 1365:  OPEN (half of it, anyway)
> 1366:  consensus to REJECT on the jabber.
> 1367:  consensus to REJECT on the jabber.
> 1369:  consensus to REJECT on jabber
> 
> So, by my reading, 1357 and 1365 are open and not blocked, while others
> that are open are awaiting some action.  Barring an action from the
> chairs I will close all those that are "PROPOSE REJECT" or "PROPOSE
> CLOSED" in the next day or so (they can always be reopened if the chairs
> find I've erred).
> 
> Eliot
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
>