[ietf-dkim] Jabber session this Thursday 1500 UTC

[Stephen Farrell]

Dave Crocker wrote:
> 
> 
> Steve Atkins wrote:
>> Given that jabber appears to be not ready for
>> prime time, in oh so many ways, has anyone
>> considered using a more reliable technology?
> 
> 
> Sorry, Steve, but I do not know of any problems with Jabber/xmpp 
> technology, and its overall track record for IETF use has been 
> excellent.  Further the range of free client software seems quite good.
> 
> The problem we are having is operational, with a donated service.  (And, 
> by the way, it's rarely been a problem during IETF week, so this is not 
> a case of reaching some sort of limit.)

Tend to agree. Jabber during IETF meetings is generally v. good
and it certainly saved this WG a bunch of time when we used it in
the spring.

Maybe someone needs to donate a bit more kit to whoever runs
jabber.org?

But there are a bunch more servers out there, so we're not bound
by jabber.org once we know to avoid it.

S.