[ietf-dkim] Jabber session this Thursday 1500 UTC
stephen.farrell at cs.tcd.ie
Thu Oct 5 09:02:51 PDT 2006
Dave Crocker wrote:
> Steve Atkins wrote:
>> Given that jabber appears to be not ready for
>> prime time, in oh so many ways, has anyone
>> considered using a more reliable technology?
> Sorry, Steve, but I do not know of any problems with Jabber/xmpp
> technology, and its overall track record for IETF use has been
> excellent. Further the range of free client software seems quite good.
> The problem we are having is operational, with a donated service. (And,
> by the way, it's rarely been a problem during IETF week, so this is not
> a case of reaching some sort of limit.)
Tend to agree. Jabber during IETF meetings is generally v. good
and it certainly saved this WG a bunch of time when we used it in
Maybe someone needs to donate a bit more kit to whoever runs
But there are a bunch more servers out there, so we're not bound
by jabber.org once we know to avoid it.
More information about the ietf-dkim