Third quarter 2006 Archives by date

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Sat Jul 1 06:40:49 PDT 2006
Ending: Fri Sep 29 17:09:47 PDT 2006
Messages: 2141

• [ietf-dkim] "adjunct" DKIM web page updated   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] is s= really needed?   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] section 5 rewrite?   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] IANA considerations...   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues   Paul Hoffman
• [ietf-dkim] is s= really needed?   Paul Hoffman
• [ietf-dkim] IANA considerations...   Paul Hoffman
• [ietf-dkim] section 5 rewrite?   Paul Hoffman
• [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits   Paul Hoffman
• [ietf-dkim] dkim-base-03 key-*-tag minor issues   SUZUKI Takahiko
• [ietf-dkim] bh=; l=0;   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] is s= really needed?   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] is s= really needed?   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] Re: bh=; l=0;   Paul Hoffman
• [ietf-dkim] bh=; l=0;   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] Re: bh=; l=0;   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Re: bh=; l=0;   Paul Hoffman
• [ietf-dkim] bh=; l=0;   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] bh=; l=0;   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] bh=; l=0;   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] bh=; l=0;   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues   Peter Koch
• [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits   Eric Allman
• [ietf-dkim] section 5 rewrite?   Eric Allman
• [ietf-dkim] dkim-base-03 key-*-tag minor issues   Eric Allman
• [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits   Tony Hansen
• [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] section 5 rewrite?   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits   Eric Rescorla
• [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues   Peter Koch
• [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits   Eric Rescorla
• [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits   Stephen Farrell
• DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits)   Paul Hoffman
• [ietf-dkim] new issue: more details of key record format in base   Stephen Farrell
• Reference to ID-AUTH-RES (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits)   Paul Hoffman
• DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits)   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] CNAME's   Michael Thomas
• DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits)   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] Re: CNAME's   John L
• DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits)   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] Re: CNAME's   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] Re: CNAME's   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] CNAME's   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] CNAME's   Peter Koch
• [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] CNAME's   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] CNAME's   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] CNAME's   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] CNAME's   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] CNAME's   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] CNAME's + multiple selector labels   Douglas Otis
• DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits)   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] CNAME's   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] CNAME's   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] CNAME's   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] jabber   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] DKIM Agenda Item Safer than SSP   Douglas Otis
• DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits)   Paul Hoffman
• DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits)   Jim Fenton
• DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits)   Paul Hoffman
• [ietf-dkim] DKIM Agenda Item Safer than SSP   Paul Hoffman
• DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits)   Douglas Otis
• DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits)   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] DKIM Agenda Item Safer than SSP   Dave Crocker
• DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits)   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] CNAME's   David Mayne
• [ietf-dkim] DKIM Agenda Item Safer than SSP   Douglas Otis
• DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits)   Paul Hoffman
• DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits)   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] CNAME's   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] CNAME's   David Mayne
• [ietf-dkim] CNAME's   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] CNAME's   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] IANA considerations...   Tony Hansen
• [ietf-dkim] Working-Group Last Call on draft-ietf-dkim-base-03   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] DKIM Agenda Item Safer than SSP   Paul Hoffman
• [ietf-dkim] DKIM Agenda Item Safer than SSP   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] DKIM Agenda Item Safer than SSP   Douglas Otis
• DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits)   Douglas Otis
• DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits)   Eliot Lear
• DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits)   Douglas Otis
• DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits)   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits   Eric Allman
• DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits)   Hector Santos
• DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits)   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits   Eric Allman
• [ietf-dkim] new issue: more details of key record format in base   Eric Allman
• [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits   Stephen Farrell
• DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits)   Douglas Otis
• DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits)   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] dots in selectors   Eric Allman
• [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits   Eric Rescorla
• [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues   Eric Allman
• [ietf-dkim] dots in selectors   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] dots in selectors   Eric Allman
• [ietf-dkim] dots in selectors   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues   Tony Hansen
• [ietf-dkim] dots in selectors   Tony Hansen
• [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues   Eric Allman
• [ietf-dkim] Consistency among keys using q= alternatives   Eric Allman
• [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Comments on -overview document?   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Comments on -overview document?   Jim Fenton (fenton)
• [ietf-dkim] Comments on -overview document?   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] Comments on -overview document?   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Comments on -overview document?   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Comments on -overview document?   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] [Fwd: DKIM - ROOM CHANGE]   stephen.farrell at cs.tcd.ie
• [ietf-dkim] Comments on -overview document?   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Comments on -overview document?   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Comments on -overview document?   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] Comments on -overview document?   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Comments on -overview document?   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] Comments on -overview document?   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] Comments on -overview document?   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Comments on -overview document?   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01   EKR
• [ietf-dkim] Comments on -overview document?   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01   EKR
• [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01   EKR
• [ietf-dkim] draft text for specify IANA instructions   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] draft text for specify IANA instructions   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] plain-text and g=   Tony Hansen
• [ietf-dkim] draft text for specify IANA instructions   Tony Hansen
• [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01   Eric Allman
• [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01   EKR
• [ietf-dkim] plain-text and g=   Eric Allman
• [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: NAKED CR & LF issues with body canonicalization   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] selectors, _policy._domainkey   Tony Hansen
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] +1 on requirements for ssp-like-thing   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01   Eric Allman
• [ietf-dkim] +1 on requirements for ssp-like-thing   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] DKIIM WG - quck summary for saag   stephen.farrell at cs.tcd.ie
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   stephen.farrell at cs.tcd.ie
• [ietf-dkim] DKIIM WG - quck summary for saag   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] +1 on requirements for ssp-like-thing   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   Eric Allman
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   Eric Allman
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   Eric Allman
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   Eric Allman
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   Eric Allman
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   Tony Hansen
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   william(at)elan.net
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01   Eric Allman
• [ietf-dkim] selectors, _policy._domainkey   Eric Allman
• [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   Eric Allman
• [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01   Eric Allman
• [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   Tony Hansen
• [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] selectors, _policy._domainkey   Tony Hansen
• [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   Sandy Wills
• [ietf-dkim] selectors, _policy._domainkey   Eric Allman
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   Eric Allman
• [ietf-dkim] Possible problem with "simple" body canonicalization -- trailing CRLFs   Eric Allman
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   Sandy Wills
• [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Possible problem with "simple" body canonicalization -- trailing CRLFs   Tony Hansen
• [ietf-dkim] Possible problem with "simple" body canonicalization -- trailing CRLFs   Eric Allman
• [ietf-dkim] Possible problem with "simple" body canonicalization -- trailing CRLFs   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   william(at)elan.net
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Possible problem with "simple" bodycanonicalization -- trailing CRLFs   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Possible problem with "simple" body canonicalization -- trailing CRLFs   Tony Hansen
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   Sandy Wills
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   Tony Hansen
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   Tony Hansen
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] selectors, _policy._domainkey   Tony Hansen
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   Tony Hansen
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other "originator" headers?   Eric Allman
• [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other "originator" headers?   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other "originator" headers?   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other "originator" headers?   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] Issue: which headers should we REQUIRE to be signed?   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] Resent-* handling (was: Draft minutes...)   Eric Allman
• [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other "originator" headers?   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other "originator" headers?   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] Issue: which headers should we REQUIRE to be signed?   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other "originator" headers?   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] Issue: which headers should we REQUIRE to be signed?   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] Issue: which headers should we REQUIRE to be signed?   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] Issue: which headers should we REQUIRE to be signed?   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other "originator" headers?   Eric Allman
• [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other "originator" headers?   Tony Hansen
• [ietf-dkim] Issue: which headers should we REQUIRE to be signed?   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] Issue: which headers should we REQUIRE to be signed?   Tony Hansen
• [ietf-dkim] Issue: which headers should we REQUIRE to be signed?   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] Final Call for Participation -- CEAS 2006   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   wayne
• [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...   Eric Allman
• [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other "originator" headers?   ned+dkim at mauve.mrochek.com
• [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other "originator" headers?   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other "originator" headers?   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other "originator" headers?   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other "originator" headers?   Tony Hansen
• [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other "originator" headers?   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other "originator" headers?   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other "originator" headers?   Eric Allman
• [ietf-dkim] timing on base-04 draft   Eric Allman
• [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other"originator" headers?   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other"originator" headers?   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] +1 on requirements for ssp-like-thing   Arvel Hathcock
• [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other "originator" headers?   Arvel Hathcock
• [ietf-dkim] +1 on requirements for ssp-like-thing   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] More on naked CR canonicalization   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] More on naked CR canonicalization   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] More on naked CR canonicalization   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] More on naked CR canonicalization   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] More on naked CR canonicalization   ned+dkim at mauve.mrochek.com
• [ietf-dkim] More on naked CR canonicalization   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] More on naked CR canonicalization   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] More on naked CR canonicalization   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] More on naked CR canonicalization   ned+dkim at mauve.mrochek.com
• [ietf-dkim] More on naked CR canonicalization   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] More on naked CR canonicalization   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-04 submitted   Eric Allman
• [ietf-dkim] Yahoo's domainkeys as historic: timing   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] Yahoo's domainkeys as historic: timing   Paul Hoffman
• [ietf-dkim] Yahoo's domainkeys as historic: timing   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Yahoo's domainkeys as historic: timing   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] Yahoo's domainkeys as historic: timing   Graham Murray
• [ietf-dkim] Yahoo's domainkeys as historic: timing   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] Yahoo's domainkeys as historic: timing   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] Yahoo's domainkeys as historic: timing   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-04 submitted   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-04 submitted   Paul Hoffman
• [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-04 submitted   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-04 submitted   Tony Hansen
• [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: NAKED CR & LF issues with body canonicalization   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: NAKED CR & LF issues with body canonicalization   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: NAKED CR & LF issues with body canonicalization   John L
• [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: NAKED CR & LF issues with body canonicalization   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: NAKED CR & LF issues with body canonicalization   John L
• [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: NAKED CR & LF issues with body canonicalization   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: NAKED CR & LF issues with body canonicalization   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: NAKED CR & LF issues with bodycanonicalization   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: NAKED CR & LF issues with bodycanonicalization   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: NAKED CR & LF issues with body canonicalization   ned+dkim at mauve.mrochek.com
• [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: NAKED CR & LF issues with body canonicalization   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: NAKED CR & LF issues with body canonicalization   ned+dkim at mauve.mrochek.com
• [ietf-dkim] Yahoo's domainkeys as historic: timing   SM
• [ietf-dkim] Yahoo's domainkeys as historic: timing   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-base-04.txt   Internet-Drafts at ietf.org
• [ietf-dkim] Which tags are required?   Paul Hoffman
• [ietf-dkim] Which tags are required?   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] Which tags are required?   Tony Hansen
• [ietf-dkim] Which tags are required?   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Which tags are required?   Paul Hoffman
• [ietf-dkim] Which tags are required?   Sandy Wills
• [ietf-dkim] Which tags are required?   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Internationalized domain names   Paul Hoffman
• [ietf-dkim] Possible problem with "simple" body canonicalization -- trailing CRLFs   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Possible problem with "simple" body canonicalization -- trailing CRLFs   Tony Hansen
• [ietf-dkim] Possible problem with "simple" body canonicalization -- trailing CRLFs   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] Possible problem with "simple" body canonicalization -- trailing CRLFs   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Possible problem with "simple" body canonicalization -- trailing CRLFs   Tony Hansen
• [ietf-dkim] Internationalized domain names   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Internationalized domain names   Paul Hoffman
• [ietf-dkim] Possible problem with "simple" body canonicalization -- trailing CRLFs   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] base WGLC reminder - Friday   stephen.farrell at cs.tcd.ie
• [ietf-dkim] base-04 //inverting key t= 's'ub-domain flag   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Possible problem with "simple" body canonicalization -- trailing CRLFs   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] base-04 //inverting key t= 's'ub-domain flag   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Possible problem with "simple" body canonicalization -- trailing CRLFs   ned+dkim at mauve.mrochek.com
• [ietf-dkim] base-04 //inverting key t= 's'ub-domain flag   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] base-04 //inverting key t= 's'ub-domain flag   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Internationalized domain names   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Internationalized domain names   Paul Hoffman
• [ietf-dkim] base-04 //inverting key t= 's'ub-domain flag   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] base-04 //inverting key t= 's'ub-domain flag   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] base-04 //inverting key t= 's'ub-domain flag   Paul Hoffman
• [ietf-dkim] Possible problem with "simple" body canonicalization -- trailing CRLFs   John L
• [ietf-dkim] base-04 //inverting key t= 's'ub-domain flag   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] base-04 //inverting key t= 's'ub-domain flag   Tony Hansen
• [ietf-dkim] base-04 //inverting key t= 's'ub-domain flag   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] Internationalized domain names   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822 was - Possible problem with "simple" body canonicalization -- trailing CRLFs   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] More on naked CR canonicalization   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] More on naked CR canonicalization   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Internationalized domain names   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Internationalized domain names   Paul Hoffman
• [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] More on naked CR canonicalization   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] Internationalized domain names   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Internationalized domain names   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] More on naked CR canonicalization   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] More on naked CR canonicalization   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Internationalized domain names   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Base-04 // Semantics of Multiple Signatures   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Base-04 //deprecated cryptographic algorithms   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Base-04 //deprecated cryptographic algorithms   stephen.farrell at cs.tcd.ie
• [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Base-04 //deprecated cryptographic algorithms   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822   John L
• [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Base-04 //deprecated cryptographic algorithms   Tony Hansen
• [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] Base-04 //deprecated cryptographic algorithms   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] bare CR and 822/2822 or just 2822   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] Relaxed Body Canon   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Relaxed Body Canon   John L
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Relaxed Body Canon   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Relaxed Body Canon   Tony Hansen
• [ietf-dkim] Relaxed Body Canon   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Relaxed Body Canon   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Base-04 // ABNF cruft & errors   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Base-04 //Security Concerns beyond Zone delegation   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Base-04 // ABNF cruft & errors   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] Base-04 // ABNF cruft & errors   Tony Hansen
• [ietf-dkim] Base-04 // ABNF cruft & errors   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822   ned+dkim at mauve.mrochek.com
• [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822   ned+dkim at mauve.mrochek.com
• [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822   ned+dkim at mauve.mrochek.com
• [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] Document Action: 'Analysis of Threats Motivating DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)' to Informational RFC   The IESG
• [ietf-dkim] Document Action: 'Analysis of Threats Motivating DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)' to Informational RFC   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Document Action: 'Analysis of Threats Motivating DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)' to Informational RFC   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Eat all CR/LF - STRIP Canonicalization Method   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Eat all CR/LF - STRIP Canonicalization Method   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] Eat all CR/LF - STRIP Canonicalization Method   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Patrick Peterson
• [ietf-dkim] Eat all CR/LF - STRIP Canonicalization Method   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] Eat all CR/LF - STRIP Canonicalization Method   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Eat all CR/LF - STRIP Canonicalization Method   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Eat all CR/LF - STRIP Canonicalization Method   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] Eat all CR/LF - STRIP Canonicalization Method   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policyoptions   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policyoptions   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policyoptions   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] Status of -base after working-group last call   DKIM Chair
• [ietf-dkim] How to proceed with SSP   DKIM Chair
• [ietf-dkim] How to proceed with SSP   Arvel Hathcock
• [ietf-dkim] Status of -base after working-group last call   Arvel Hathcock
• [ietf-dkim] Status of -base after working-group last call   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Arvel Hathcock
• [ietf-dkim] Status of -base after working-group last call   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] DKIM base v=0.4 up and running   Arvel Hathcock
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] How to proceed with SSP   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] requirements   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] requirements   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] requirements   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] domain (reputation) semantics: selectors vs. sub-domains   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] How to proceed with SSP   J.D. Falk
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] domain (reputation) semantics: selectors vs. sub-domains   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Steve Atkins
• MX 0 . (was Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options)   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] domain (reputation) semantics: selectors vs. sub-domains   Mark Delany
• MX 0 . (was Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options)   william(at)elan.net
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] I send nothing   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Hector Santos
• MX 0 . (was Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options)   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] How to proceed with SSP   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] Designated Signing Domains and Don't Sign assertions   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] requirements   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] domain (reputation) semantics: selectors vs. sub-domains   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] domain (reputation) semantics: selectors vs. sub-domains   J.D. Falk
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] requirements   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] requirements   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] I send nothing   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] domain (reputation) semantics: selectors vs. sub-domains   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] I send nothing   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] I send nothing   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] I send nothing   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] I send nothing   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] I send nothing   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] requirements   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] I send nothing   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] I send nothing   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] requirements   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] I send nothing   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] domain (reputation) semantics: selectors vs. sub-domains   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] I send nothing   Arvel Hathcock
• [ietf-dkim] I send nothing   Arvel Hathcock
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Arvel Hathcock
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Arvel Hathcock
• [ietf-dkim] requirements   Arvel Hathcock
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] I send nothing   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] domain (reputation) semantics: selectors vs. sub-domains   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] How to proceed with SSP   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] domain (reputation) semantics: selectors vs. sub-domains   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   wayne
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail   Paul Hoffman
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail   wayne
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail   wayne
• [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail   Paul Hoffman
• [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail   Paul Hoffman
• [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Jon Callas
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Jon Callas
• [ietf-dkim] requirements   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Arvel Hathcock
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] requirements   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] requirements   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Jon Callas
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] requirements   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail   Paul Hoffman
• [ietf-dkim] requirements   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] requirements   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] requirements   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] SSP complications, wa The URL to my paper ...   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] requirements   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] SSP complications, wa The URL to my paper ...   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] requirements   Jon Callas
• [ietf-dkim] SSP complications, wa The URL to my paper ...   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] Requirements on where/how SSP stuff is published...   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] Requirements on how SSP stuff is found...   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] 3rd party signing   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] Requirements on where/how SSP stuff is published...   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] SSP complications, wa The URL to my paper ...   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] Requirements on how SSP stuff is found...   william(at)elan.net
• [ietf-dkim] Requirements on where/how SSP stuff is published...   william(at)elan.net
• [ietf-dkim] SSP complications, wa The URL to my paper ...   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] requirements   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Requirements on where/how SSP stuff is published...   Arvel Hathcock
• [ietf-dkim] SSP complications, wa The URL to my paper ...   william(at)elan.net
• [ietf-dkim] include   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Requirements on where/how SSP stuff is published...   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] include   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] SSP complications, wa The URL to my paper ...   John L
• [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing   John L
• [ietf-dkim] RE: 3rd party signing   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] include   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] include   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] include   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] SSP complications, wa The URL to my paper ...   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] include   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] RE: 3rd party signing   John L
• [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing   John L
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] Requirements on where/how SSP stuff is published...   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Requirements on where/how SSP stuff is published...   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing   John L
• [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Requirements on how SSP stuff is found...   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   John L
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] Requirements on where/how SSP stuff is published...   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] Requirements on where/how SSP stuff is published...   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Requirements on how SSP stuff is found...   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Jon Callas
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Jon Callas
• [ietf-dkim] Requirements on how SSP stuff is found...   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] Requirements on how SSP stuff is found...   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] SSP complications, wa The URL to my paper ...   william(at)elan.net
• [ietf-dkim] Requirements on how SSP stuff is found...   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] SSP complications, wa The URL to my paper ...   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Requirements on where/how SSP stuff is published...   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] Reflector update   Arvel Hathcock
• [ietf-dkim] Reflector update   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Requirements on where/how SSP stuff is published...   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Requirements on where/how SSP stuff is published...   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Requirements on where/how SSP stuff is published...   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] Requirements on where/how SSP stuff is published...   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] scenarios   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] SSP complications, wa The URL to my paper ...   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] SSP complications, wa The URL to my paper ...   Stephen Farrell
• DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits)   Dave Crocker
• DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits)   Stephen Farrell
• DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits)   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] scenarios   Mark Delany
• DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits)   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] scenarios   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] scenarios   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] Summarizing the small/non-technical domain owner scenario   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] Requirements on where/how SSP stuff is published...   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Requirements on where/how SSP stuff is published...   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Requirements on where/how SSP stuff is published...   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] SSP complications, wa The URL to my paper ...   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] SSP complications, wa The URL to my paper ...   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Requirements on how SSP stuff is found...   Arvel Hathcock
• [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing   william(at)elan.net
• [ietf-dkim] Requirements on how SSP stuff is found...   william(at)elan.net
• [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing   John L
• [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing   william(at)elan.net
• [ietf-dkim] Requirements on how SSP stuff is found...   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing   John L
• [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   John L
• [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing   John L
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successfulverify?   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing   Arvel Hathcock
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successfulverify?   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?   Arvel Hathcock
• [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing   wayne
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on asuccessfulverify?   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Requirements on how SSP stuff is found...   Arvel Hathcock
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successfulverify?   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing (designated and non-designated)   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?   Tony Hansen
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing   william(at)elan.net
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   John L
• [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] Possible Signing Practices non-technical terminology   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Possible Signing Practices non-technical terminology   william(at)elan.net
• [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successfulverify?   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   John L
• [ietf-dkim] DKIM Signature Authorization Protocol (DSAP)   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?   Arvel Hathcock
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?   Arvel Hathcock
• [ietf-dkim] New Requirement: SSP must|should support DKIM-BASE semantics   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] New Requirements: SSP must offer Highest Protection Possible   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] New Requirements: SSP must offer Highest Protection Possible   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] New Requirements: SSP must offer Highest ProtectionPossible   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?   Arvel Hathcock
• [ietf-dkim] New Requirements: SSP must offer Highest Protection Possible   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?   Arvel Hathcock
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] New Requirements: SSP must offer Highest Protection Possible   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Crypto Algorithm policy/practice   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] New Requirements: SSP must offer Highest Protection Possible   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Crypto Algorithm policy/practice   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Crypto Algorithm policy/practice   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   John L
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] requirements   Patrick Peterson
• [ietf-dkim] Back to basics with requirements   Patrick Peterson
• [ietf-dkim] Crypto Algorithm policy/practice   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] New Requirements: SSP must offer Highest Protection Possible   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   wayne
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   John L
• [ietf-dkim] New Requirements: SSP must offer Highest Protection Possible   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] SSP additional tag?   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] SSP additional tag?   wayne
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] WG and individual submissions...   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] WG and individual submissions...   Tony Hansen
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successfulverify?   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successfulverify?   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successfulverify?   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] SSP additional tag?   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successfulverify?   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Arvel Hathcock
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successfulverify?   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successfulverify?   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] SSP additional tag?   william(at)elan.net
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Paul Hoffman
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Arvel Hathcock
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] SSP additional tag?   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] SSP additional tag?   william(at)elan.net
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Arvel Hathcock
• [ietf-dkim] SSP additional tag?   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   John L
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Paul Hoffman
• [ietf-dkim] How MALLET PERFORMS a DOWNGRADE ATTACK   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Re: How MALLET PERFORMS a DOWNGRADE ATTACK   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] Re: How MALLET PERFORMS a DOWNGRADE ATTACK   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Re: How MALLET PERFORMS a DOWNGRADE ATTACK   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] How MALLET PERFORMS a DOWNGRADE ATTACK   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] How MALLET PERFORMS a DOWNGRADE ATTACK   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] How MALLET PERFORMS a DOWNGRADE ATTACK   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   John L
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Arvel Hathcock
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] What third-party ISP problem?   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] What third-party ISP problem?   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] SSP - Sender Signing Policy archived discussions   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] RE: How MALLET PERFORMS a DOWNGRADE ATTACK   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] Re: How MALLET PERFORMS a DOWNGRADE ATTACK   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] What third-party ISP problem?   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] What third-party ISP problem?   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] What third-party ISP problem?   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] What third-party ISP problem?   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] What third-party ISP problem?   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] Re: How MALLET PERFORMS a DOWNGRADE ATTACK   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] What third-party ISP problem?   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] What third-party ISP problem?   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] What third-party ISP problem?   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] What third-party ISP problem?   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] What third-party ISP problem?   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] More on naked CR canonicalization   Eric Allman
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   John L
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] What third-party ISP problem?   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] Requirement: Policy Attributes Must Enhance the Security and Surviabiility of DKIM-BASE   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Requirement: Policy Attributes Must Enhance the Security and Surviabiility of DKIM-BASE   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] All done on potential SSP requirements?   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] Requirement: Policy Attributes Must Enhance the Security and Surviability of DKIM-BASE   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] All done on potential SSP requirements?   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] All done on potential SSP requirements?   Jeff Macdonald
• [ietf-dkim] All done on potential SSP requirements?   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] All done on potential SSP requirements?   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] The key record upgrade attack   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] All done on potential SSP requirements?   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] The key record upgrade attack   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] The key record upgrade attack   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] The key record upgrade attack   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] The key record upgrade attack   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] What third-party ISP problem?   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] The key record upgrade attack   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] What third-party ISP problem?   John L
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   John L
• [ietf-dkim] The key record upgrade attack   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] All done on potential SSP requirements?   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   John L
• [ietf-dkim] The key record upgrade attack   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] The key record upgrade attack   Paul Hoffman
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] The key record upgrade attack   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] The key record upgrade attack   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] The key record upgrade attack   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] The key record upgrade attack   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] The key record upgrade attack   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] The key record upgrade attack   Paul Hoffman
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] The key record upgrade attack   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] The key record upgrade attack   Paul Hoffman
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   John L
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   John L
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] The key record upgrade attack   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   John L
• [ietf-dkim] SSP thought experiment   John L
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] The key record upgrade attack   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] SSP thought experiment   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] SSP thought experiment   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] SSP thought experiment   John L
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   John L
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] New Requirements: SSP must offer Highest Protection Possible   william(at)elan.net
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   wayne
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   John L
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   william(at)elan.net
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   John L
• [ietf-dkim] New Requirements: SSP must offer Highest Protection Possible   william(at)elan.net
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Arvel Hathcock
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Arvel Hathcock
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   william(at)elan.net
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] punting into near-term standardization   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements   John L
• [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] punting into near-term standardization   Arvel Hathcock
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   Arvel Hathcock
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements   John L
• [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   John L
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements   william(at)elan.net
• [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] The problem with sender policy   John L
• [ietf-dkim] DKIM Client Policy Requirement   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] The problem with sender policy   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] The problem with sender policy   John L
• [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] The problem with sender policy   william(at)elan.net
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] List based policy   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] punting into near-term standardization   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] List based policy   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] punting into near-term standardization   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] Re: "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   Frank Ellermann
• [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] SSP discussion...   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   Arvel Hathcock
• [ietf-dkim] The problem with sender policy   Arvel Hathcock
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   william(at)elan.net
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] How to reconcile passive vs active?   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] How to reconcile passive vs active? &n