[ietf-dkim] New issue: Requirement #10 - Invoking SSP -
Suggestion to Remove this.
dotis at mail-abuse.org
Tue Sep 26 13:40:31 PDT 2006
On Sep 26, 2006, at 1:08 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Michael Thomas:
>> Arvel Hathcock wrote:
>>>> 10. The Protocol MUST NOT be required to be invoked if a
>>>> valid first party signature is found.
>>> Hector, doesn_t it say exactly what you want it to say? It says
>>> that the protocol must not require invocation when valid first
>>> party signatures are found. It doesn't say "THOU SHALT NOT INVOKE
>>> THE PROTOCOL". I see nothing that needs to be changed.
> I agree.
Are these policies to be used in only one protocol, or might there be
multiple protocols that make use of these policy records?
More information about the ietf-dkim