[ietf-dkim] New issue: Requirement #10 - Invoking SSP - Suggestion to Remove this.

[Douglas Otis]

On Sep 26, 2006, at 1:08 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:

> Michael Thomas:
>> Arvel Hathcock wrote:
>>
>>>> 10.  The Protocol MUST NOT be required to be invoked if a
>>>>     valid first party signature is found.
>>>
>>> Hector, doesn_t it say exactly what you want it to say?  It says
>>> that the protocol must not require invocation when valid first
>>> party signatures are found.  It doesn't say "THOU SHALT NOT INVOKE
>>> THE PROTOCOL".  I see nothing that needs to be changed.
>>
>> Exactly.
>
> I agree.

Are these policies to be used in only one protocol, or might there be  
multiple protocols that make use of these policy records?

-Doug