[ietf-dkim] New issue: Requirement #10 - Invoking SSP - Suggestion to Remove this.

[Wietse Venema]

Michael Thomas:
> Arvel Hathcock wrote:
> 
> >>10.  The Protocol MUST NOT be required to be invoked if a
> >>     valid first party signature is found. 
> >
> >Hector, doesn_t it say exactly what you want it to say?  It says
> > that the protocol must not require invocation when valid first
> > party signatures are found.  It doesn't say "THOU SHALT NOT INVOKE
> > THE PROTOCOL".  I see nothing that needs to be changed.
>
> Exactly.

I agree.

	Wietse