[ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Problems with Scenario 4: Resent
dhc at dcrocker.net
Fri Sep 22 10:21:43 PDT 2006
>>>>>> Whatever SSP does (and the more interesting case is a "Bob"
>>>>>> who is completely DKIM-unaware), the mail should not be
>>>>>> rejected by the next receiver(s) ...
> Dave, I'm completely confused. The constraint of requirement 12 is a
> constraint on the protocol design in the form of "don't provide
> this". It's not telling the receiver to do anything.
Definitely a good distinction to make clear.
Unfortunately, I do not see how the language "the mail should not be
rejected" is a constraint on protocol design, only. It strikes me as an
explicit directive to an operational receiver.
More information about the ietf-dkim