[ietf-dkim] Suggested text for more intuitive parameter descriptors
arvel.hathcock at altn.com
Fri Sep 22 09:09:00 PDT 2006
> - 1201/1217 were the same. Arvel volunteered to write a
> requirements-like sentence to the effect that human-friendly
> syntax is nicer and whenever that sentence is agreed we add
> it and CLOSE these
How about this (this doesn't need to be too wordy):
"Expectations MUST be presented in the Protocol syntax using as intuitive a descriptor as possible. For example, p=! would be better represented as p=strict."
Is this ok?
More information about the ietf-dkim