[ietf-dkim] New issue: What is the purpose of SSP? {3.5} {3.5}

[J.D. Falk]

On 2006-09-21 12:49, Bill.Oxley at cox.com wrote:

>>In sum, I think the SSP-req doc should say "SSP must be published
>> by DKIM signers, and the format is <this>".  
> 
> Disagree, dkim base works now. There will be people that will move very
> slowly into implementation and requiring SSP to be implemented at the
> same time will slow adoption.

+1

Saying essentially that "confused people will be confused" isn't enough 
of a reason to mandate something.  They'll be confused anyway.

-- 
J.D. Falk, Anti-Spam Product Manager
Yahoo! Communications Platform Team