[ietf-dkim] SSP and mailing lists

Michael Thomas mike at mtcc.com
Tue Sep 12 07:03:13 PDT 2006


Scott Kitterman wrote:

>On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 21:14:11 -0700 Steve Atkins <steve at blighty.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>I certainly think that not breaking DKIM signatures will be a mild  
>>positive
>>for mailing list software, and in product terms it's probably a smart  
>>thing
>>to do. Why break something if you can easily avoid doing so?
>>
>>    
>>
>What percentage of mailing lists are you on where the list server doesn't 
>modify the body of the message?  For me it's 0%.
>
>I think "easily avoid" substantially understates the mailing list problem.
>
>  
>
my software routinely gets into the high 90% range for list traversal.
With some improvements I've made, I expect that to be much closer
to 100% when it gets installed at Cisco.

       Mike


More information about the ietf-dkim mailing list