[ietf-dkim] we don't know what SSP means

[Michael Thomas]

Dave Crocker wrote:

>
>
> Stephen Farrell wrote:
>
>> But, let's see what happens as we close out the work on ssp-reqs.
>>
>> Speaking of which, Mike hopes to have a -01 out during the next
>
>
>
> Stephen,
>
> Normally, revisions to working group documents follow explicit 
> assessments of rough consensus about changes.
>
> I do not recall seeing this done about SSP, for the changes to be made 
> to Mike's doc.
>
> So, what is the basis for Mike's making changes?

Well, for better or for worse, I'm just trying to chronical what I've 
been seeing
happen here that seems to rise above repetition from single sources. 
Feel free to
disagree with my take and open an issue so that we  can actually come to 
consensus.
I believe that the plan is to start doing the jabber thing again too.

       Mike