[ietf-dkim] SSP = FAILURE
dhc at dcrocker.net
Sat Sep 9 12:55:44 PDT 2006
John Levine wrote:
>> It seems to me you may be saying that a look-alike domain can be made
>> to look more authentic than the actual domain. Is that right? If
>> so, I'd like to understand that.
> It doesn't have to look more authentic. It only has to look as
> authentic. With SSP, everyone can publish equally authentic "PHISH
> TARGET" notices.
The list discussion seems to be spending an awful lot of time on issues
that are theoretical, poorly understand, and lacking in a clear
community consensus that we need a solution.
How is this productive?
More information about the ietf-dkim