[ietf-dkim] Re: Additional per user policy requirments
nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de
Tue Sep 5 20:35:37 PDT 2006
Stephen Farrell wrote:
> As Doug said that predates the WG.
The WG charter says "policy" (incl. the quotes) and mentions
> once reqs-01 is out. we're planning to move back into
> using the issue tracker, so you can of course raise this
> as an issue if you like
Yes. I fear the SSP adventure is over, PRA is bad, anything
else is impossible. On the SPF lists folks tried for years
to invent wild and wonderful new "identities" in addition to
the Return-Path, and they all failed miserably, incompatible
with 2822, only PRA makes remotely sense.
This "first address of the From" can't work. Maybe you could
get the RFC 2822 author as external expert about this idea,
IIRC he was also invited to comment on some MARID proposals.
More information about the ietf-dkim