[ietf-dkim] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-allman-dkim-ssp-02.txt]

[Stephen Farrell]

No, not yet. As a WG, we're still on requirements.

After we've gotten consensus on those, we should look at the
various proposals.

Of course, I'm sure all of the authors of all of the
proposals will welcome comments off list.

S.

Hector Santos wrote:
> Are we seeking comments on this new draft now?
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Jim Fenton" <fenton at cisco.com>
> To: "IETF-DKIM" <ietf-dkim at mipassoc.org>
> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 4:12 PM
> Subject: [ietf-dkim] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-allman-dkim-ssp-02.txt]
> 
> 
>> FYI, an updated version of the Allman/Delany/Fenton SSP draft is now
>> available.  The changes from -01 are fairly extensive; see the summary
>> of changes near the end of the document.
>>
>> -Jim
>>
>>
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>> directories.
>>
>>
>> Title : DKIM Sender Signing Practices
>> Author(s) : E. Allman, et al.
>> Filename : draft-allman-dkim-ssp-02.txt
>> Pages : 18
>> Date : 2006-8-31
>>
>> DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) defines a domain-level
>> authentication framework for email using public-key cryptography and
>> key server technology to permit verification of the source and
>> contents of messages by either Mail Transport Agents (MTAs) or Mail
>> User Agents (MUAs).  The primary DKIM protocol is described in
>> This document describes the records that senders may use to advertise
>> how they sign their outgoing mail, and how verifiers should access
>> and interpret those results.
>>
>> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-allman-dkim-ssp-02.txt
>> _______________________________________________
>> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
>> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
>