[ietf-dkim] Delegated signatures in real life

[Stephen Farrell]

Hector Santos wrote:
>> Since base has no normative reference to ssp then there is no
>> requirement to implement ssp for conformance with base.
>>
>> Nothing to do with being a chair that - the lack of the
>> normative reference says it all (as a quick read of the document
>> should make clear).
> 
> At the risk of being in the wrong position here, you do have the tie in with
> the TA document with pretty profound statements:

This is quite clear. Base does NOT REQUIRE SSP.

That doesn't stop anyone who implements a DKIM-verifier from using SSP
in as a enthusiastic manner as they like.

Stephen.