[ietf-dkim] Delegated signatures in real life
stephen.farrell at cs.tcd.ie
Thu Aug 31 08:09:44 PDT 2006
Hector Santos wrote:
>> Since base has no normative reference to ssp then there is no
>> requirement to implement ssp for conformance with base.
>> Nothing to do with being a chair that - the lack of the
>> normative reference says it all (as a quick read of the document
>> should make clear).
> At the risk of being in the wrong position here, you do have the tie in with
> the TA document with pretty profound statements:
This is quite clear. Base does NOT REQUIRE SSP.
That doesn't stop anyone who implements a DKIM-verifier from using SSP
in as a enthusiastic manner as they like.
More information about the ietf-dkim