[ietf-dkim] base state (was: Responsibility concerns with DesignatedSigning Domains)

[Frank Ellermann]

Stephen Farrell wrote:

 [about 10% of the 1800 unread DKIM mails]
> http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/2006q3/004108.html
> was posted on July 5th, before the current storm.

ACK, that was in my 10%, I went through it thread by thread.

> Next is that it goes to the AD and then IETF LC.

Thanks for info.  The tracker only said "I-D exists, shepherd
not yet assigned" - this will be more interesting after Barry,
Russ, or you pushed its [GO] button.

Frank