[ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns with DesignatedSigning Domains

[Stephen Farrell]

Frank Ellermann wrote:
> Stephen Farrell wrote:
>  
>> I'm sure you're aware of this of course
> 
> Actually I'm not, I missed the WGLC and read only about 10%
> of the 1800 unread DKIM mails some weeks ago.  

http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/2006q3/004108.html
was posted on July 5th, before the current storm.

 > Base-05 was
> published last week, apparently reflecting WGLC issues.  

Yep.

> Is that now intended to go to an IETF last call, or is it
> frozen waiting for whatever pops up in the SSP discussions ?

Next is that it goes to the AD and then IETF LC.

Stephen.