[ietf-dkim] Itemized Summary of SSP Requirements-00
hsantos at santronics.com
Tue Aug 29 13:29:00 PDT 2006
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker at verisign.com>
> The requirement that I believe that the delegation discussion
> highlights is the need for controlled delegation.
> I.E I delegate to Fred the ability to sign on behalf of
> marketing at example.com but not ceo at example.com.
> The delegation example is relevant because it is only the
> policy mechanism that creates the need to count a signature by
> Fred as a domain signature for example.com.
Ok, but you think it will still work or its consistent with the discovery
requirement #1 discussed in section 5.1.1? Or is this a DNS record
| 5.1. Discovery Requirements
| 5.1.1 [_] MUST use DNS RR TXT for Policy record.
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
More information about the ietf-dkim