[ietf-dkim] New Thread: Use of CNAME in place of
eric+dkim at sendmail.org
Tue Aug 29 07:35:33 PDT 2006
--On August 28, 2006 11:35:04 PM -0400 Hector Santos
<hsantos at santronics.com> wrote:
> In short, CNAME, NS, or whatever, should this level of details be
> part of the spec or some separate doc?
Definitely not a normative part of the spec, lest we head down the
slippery slope of describing how basic underlying technology works.
I think a small amount of informative text can be useful, although if
it gets to be too much (which in this case is not unlikely) it might
be moved to a separate doc.
More information about the ietf-dkim