[ietf-dkim] New Thread: Use of CNAME in place of NSsubdomain delegation

Eric Allman eric+dkim at sendmail.org
Tue Aug 29 07:35:33 PDT 2006


--On August 28, 2006 11:35:04 PM -0400 Hector Santos 
<hsantos at santronics.com> wrote:

> In short, CNAME, NS, or whatever, should this level of details be
> part of the spec or some separate doc?

Definitely not a normative part of the spec, lest we head down the 
slippery slope of describing how basic underlying technology works. 
I think a small amount of informative text can be useful, although if 
it gets to be too much (which in this case is not unlikely) it might 
be moved to a separate doc.

eric



More information about the ietf-dkim mailing list