[ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns with DesignatedSigning
stephen.farrell at cs.tcd.ie
Tue Aug 29 02:13:52 PDT 2006
Frank Ellermann wrote:
> Okay, we can update 5.4 in base if necessary, e.g. add a flag
> where that's the case.
Eh - except we're done with WGLC on base. So making that change
would require a whole lot of +1's before being on the table.
In other words: not at this time.
I'm sure you're aware of this of course, but let's not bother
with extending this thread even further for no reason. (In fact
I this thread is well beyond its use-by date already.)
More information about the ietf-dkim