[ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns with DesignatedSigning
deepvoice at gmail.com
Mon Aug 28 07:03:02 PDT 2006
> Hmmmm, maybe we have a compromise here with a special policy?
> "I don't care if 3rd party exist, I don't want them, but
> if they DO exist, it BETTER not destroy my 1st party
I will agree to this, as long as the 1st party can say "I always sign
and I have the expectation that an unsigned message from me will be
treated with extreme prejudice."
More information about the ietf-dkim