[ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design
ietf-dkim at kitterman.com
Mon Aug 21 12:10:00 PDT 2006
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 08:34:13 -0700 Dave Crocker <dhc at dcrocker.net> wrote:
>Paul Hoffman wrote:
> > I see people who supposedly agree with each other about the policy
>> appear disagree on the required and requested response to the policy.
>> Some of that is because the tone of the messages is "this is obvious"
>> (which it is not), and some of it is because there are long-winded
>> discussions of the usefulness of the messages that don't concretely say
>> what the recipient should/must do.
>For the case of mail that is signed, I am still waiting to hear why it is
>sufficient to have a third-party use a a sub-domain of the preferred
>whatever) domain name.
OTOH, it seems to me that it's been said Ad Nauseum. Where feasible I
agree it's better, but there are operational frictions that will impede
this approach in some cases.
More information about the ietf-dkim