[ietf-dkim] SSP Responsibility Delegation - Security Concerns

[Michael Thomas]

Hector Santos wrote:

>
>>So let's send this from mailinglist.com through their authorized
>>submission server:
>>
>>From: president at company.com
>>Sender: mailinglist.com
>>DKIM-signature: d=isp.com;
>>    
>>
>
>
>First, the presumption here is that president at company.com has subscribed to
>some mailing list where he should now be very aware the door is wide open to
>exploitations.
>  
>
Does anybody else agree with this statement? I'm fairly certain that my 
president
(or even the Resident for that matter) is decidedly unaware, and I can't 
imagine
a universe in which mine or any other would be aware of such a threat. 
Since this
threat does not exist with the NS delegation method, my president could 
remain
in unaware bliss which seems like as it should be.

       Mike