[ietf-dkim] Re: Requirements comment: Bigbank example description
hsantos at santronics.com
Thu Aug 10 03:32:25 PDT 2006
----- Original Message -----
From: "william(at)elan.net" <william at elan.net>
To: "Scott Kitterman" <ietf-dkim at kitterman.com>
> On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> On Wednesday 09 August 2006 21:29, Hector Santos wrote:
>>> It was my contention that the SSP should ALWAYS be done against the
>>> 2822.From regardless of how DKIM-Signature domain was bounded.
> Would you remind me how this would work with multiple address in
> the From field? [*]
What's wrong with checking each one? I mean, why allow for a loophole?
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
More information about the ietf-dkim