[ietf-dkim] Re: Requirements comment: Bigbank example description

[Hector Santos]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "william(at)elan.net" <william at elan.net>
To: "Scott Kitterman" <ietf-dkim at kitterman.com>


> On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> 
>> On Wednesday 09 August 2006 21:29, Hector Santos wrote:
>>
>>> It was my contention that the SSP should ALWAYS be done against the
>>> 2822.From regardless of how DKIM-Signature domain was bounded.
>>>
>> +1
> 
> Would you remind me how this would work with multiple address in
> the From field? [*]

What's wrong with checking each one?  I mean, why allow for a loophole?

-- 
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com