stephen.farrell at cs.tcd.ie
Wed Aug 9 14:31:45 PDT 2006
Michael Thomas wrote:
> Tony Hansen wrote:
>> add RFC2822.Sender
> I'm not the chair, but I've seen considerably less consensus about
> anything other
> than rfc2822.from. I'm frankly not sure I understand it very well.
I know I don't understand it!
Maybe a more detailed use-case would help? (Tony?)
> There's of course
> nothing that prevents a receiver from checking SSP for any
> address/domain it wants
> to, but do we now have a mandate to make assertions about any kind of
> address? How do those assertions interact with each other? What does a
> strong practice
> for ListID and a weak practice for Sender mean if they're in the same
All good questions. And maybe not too easy to be confident in
any answers at this stage?
> Finally, is this something that can wait? Ie, are we harmed if we don't
> do it now?
Again, I dunno. I believe we do have consensus that at least
rfc2822.From needs to be handled now. If more folks want
rfc2822.Sender to be handled now as well, then they should
say so I guess.
More information about the ietf-dkim