[ietf-dkim] Requirements clarification: Standard for resource
record name space collision
Scott Kitterman
ietf-dkim at kitterman.com
Wed Aug 9 10:02:29 PDT 2006
***************
*** 474,480 ****
expectation is "few".]
3. Discovery mechanism MUST NOT overload semantics of existing DNS
! resource records where name space collisions are possible.
5.2. Transport requirements
--- 479,485 ----
expectation is "few".]
3. Discovery mechanism MUST NOT overload semantics of existing DNS
! resource records where name space collisions are reasonably likely.
5.2. Transport requirements
***************
Making name space collision impossible (the written requirement) is a high
bar. Higher than was used for DKIM base. Reasonably likely seems like a
better standard. Impossible would seem to require a new RR.
Scott K
More information about the ietf-dkim
mailing list