[ietf-dkim] Clarification: Requirement #8

[Damon]

8. The Protocol is not required to publish a Practice of any/all
        unreleated third parties that MUST NOT sign on the domain
        holder's behalf.

           [INFORMATIVE NOTE: this is essentially saying that the
           protocol doesn't have to concern itself with being a
           blacklist repository.]

Spelling issue: unreleated = unrelated

also

This might be a semantics issue but, does this mean that, while it is
not required, it is still an option to be able to publish who MUST NOT
sign?

And if it _is_ still an option, does this mean that the unrelated
parties sig should be ignored or is it suggested that it be treated
with prejudice?


Regards,
Damon Sauer