[ietf-dkim] SSP requirements
hsantos at santronics.com
Sun Aug 6 04:41:41 PDT 2006
What is out of line is one who is suppose be writing the design requirement
has suddenly decided that it probably isn't a good idea after all.
What's wrong with that picture? Ban me if you must, I will not lower my
standards, my ethics nor morals. Never.
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stephen Farrell" <stephen.farrell at cs.tcd.ie>
To: "Hector Santos" <hsantos at santronics.com>
Cc: <ietf-dkim at mipassoc.org>
Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2006 7:03 AM
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements
> I missed this one earlier.
> Hector Santos wrote:
> > My apology to the WG chairs, but this is utterly ridiculous position
> > from a person who is suppose to write the SSP design requirements. It
> > badly with obvious signs of conflict of interest by specific individuals
> > kill SSP.
> This is also out of line. You're accusing someone of bad faith (which
> is totally out-of-line) and without even waiting to see the I-D (which
> is ridiculously premature).
More information about the ietf-dkim