[ietf-dkim] SSP requirements

[Hector Santos]

What is out of line is one who is suppose be writing the design requirement
has suddenly decided that it probably isn't a good idea after all.

What's wrong with that picture?  Ban me if you must, I will not lower my
standards, my ethics nor morals.  Never.

--
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com


----- Original Message -----

From: "Stephen Farrell" <stephen.farrell at cs.tcd.ie>
To: "Hector Santos" <hsantos at santronics.com>
Cc: <ietf-dkim at mipassoc.org>
Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2006 7:03 AM
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements


>
> Hector,
>
> I missed this one earlier.
>
> Hector Santos wrote:
> > My apology to the WG chairs, but this is utterly ridiculous position
coming
> > from a person who is suppose to write the SSP design requirements.  It
reeks
> > badly with obvious signs of conflict of interest by specific individuals
to
> > kill SSP.
>
> This is also out of line. You're accusing someone of bad faith (which
> is totally out-of-line) and without even waiting to see the I-D (which
> is ridiculously premature).
>
> Stephen.
>