[ietf-dkim] SSP requirements
stephen.farrell at cs.tcd.ie
Sun Aug 6 04:03:06 PDT 2006
I missed this one earlier.
Hector Santos wrote:
> My apology to the WG chairs, but this is utterly ridiculous position coming
> from a person who is suppose to write the SSP design requirements. It reeks
> badly with obvious signs of conflict of interest by specific individuals to
> kill SSP.
This is also out of line. You're accusing someone of bad faith (which
is totally out-of-line) and without even waiting to see the I-D (which
is ridiculously premature).
More information about the ietf-dkim