[ietf-dkim] SSP requirements
johnl at iecc.com
Sat Aug 5 13:42:14 PDT 2006
> That's a pretty reasonable question, frankly. The set of domains that
> would actually benefit from SSP from the consensus I've seen seems like
> it's a pretty tiny fraction of the internet at large and almost
> certainly could be handled by third party dnsbl-like or accreditation
> schemes as well.
Agreed. That's what I've been thinking all along.
> But it may be worth it if for no other reason to provide the transport,
> discovery, and syntax framework for putting goodies in for the
If people want to do experiements, they should do experiments. The IESG
would never go for an SSP spec that was just a container for data yet to
More information about the ietf-dkim