[ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom

[Arvel Hathcock]

> If a signer wants to take that risk, isn't that for them to decide?

Precisely.

> Also, if the usual strategy of a verifier is to bounce (or be
> encouraged to bounce) the offending email, a "I sign all" sender will
> almost always know about delivery failures of originally signed
> traffic and be able to act accordingly. 

Right.  I don't see a big reason to worry with this at all.  There are all sorts of reasons SMTP might bounce a message back as it is.

-- 
Arvel