[ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom

[Dave Crocker]

John L wrote:
> It may sound like I'm channelling Dave here, but I don't want to put
> anything into a protocol that doesn't have a straightforward operational
> value, and I don't think that "stir it into the mix in spamassassin" is
> straightforward.

It ain't me.  It's a long-standing pattern of what gets deployed and used.

So if there is any channeling, we are both doing it, on behalf of the God of
Successful Protocols...

d/
-- 

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net