[ietf-dkim] SSP thought experiment

[Bill.Oxley at cox.com]

One would assume that an additional signing algorithm has been introduced and not using the TOM SWIFTY algorithm I would refer to base and treat your message as unsigned.
thanks,


-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org on behalf of John L
Sent: Fri 8/4/2006 2:05 PM
To: DKIM List
Subject: [ietf-dkim] SSP thought experiment
 
a) "SIGN ALL MAIL" and "DO NOT USE ANY SERVICES KNOWN TO DAMAGE THEIR SIGNATURES"

b) "SIGN ALL MAIL"

I want to put "ALL MAIL HAS TOM SWIFTIES" in my SSP.

Assuming you agree that's ridiculous, what's the practical difference to 
people using SSP between that and b) above?

Regards,
John Levine, johnl at iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://johnlevine.com, Mayor
"I dropped the toothpaste", said Tom, crestfallenly.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html