[ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail
mike at mtcc.com
Tue Aug 1 17:29:21 PDT 2006
Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
>You do need 'I sign nothing' since you need to be able to terminate
searches for DKIM policy records regardless of whether we use the
extended prefix scheme I propose or some variant of tree walking.
Actually this seems like a good point: it's a discovery marker much more
policy marker. This sort of folds in with the nicety of having this sort
around for forensic purposes.
Is there any discovery related requirement here other than the "must
in deterministic number of steps" one that we all seem to agree on?
More information about the ietf-dkim