[ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms

[Damon]

I understand that it is not a reputation service, however, I am now at the
mercy of my ISP's reputation and not mine. In fact, they are full of bots
and spammers.

 Consider:
 I never sign email coming from Holiday Inn where 50% on my workforce lives
out of suitcases but Holiday Inn does sign (inconsequential)
 I always sign email coming from the home office in Walla Walla.
 Therefore my rule says that I sometimes sign. But what good did that do me?
My ISP is the issue, not Holiday Inn. So, if I was able to say I sometimes
sign my email and I always sign from the home office, it would be too much
of a DNS load to describe where I might sometimes sign. It would be better
if I could specifically just distrust my ISP.

Regards,
Damon Sauer


On 8/1/06, Hector Santos <hsantos at santronics.com> wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Thomas" <mike at mtcc.com>
> To: "Damon" <deepvoice at gmail.com>
>
>
>
> > There has been suggestion in the past of the desire for a policy
> > for "I sign everything, don't accept a message with *any*
> > third party signatures". I've yet to see why anybody would
> > want to set such a policy in real life though.
>
> hmmm, Isn't this "highly exclusive" policy just happens to be the most
> powerful protection the DKIM protocol has to offer?
>
> If made available, the highest protection, will be the most likely policy
> used... in real life.
>
> --
> Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
> http://www.santronics.com
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/attachments/20060801/38a95674/attachment.html