[ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing

[Dave Crocker]

Mark Delany wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 09:59:19AM -0400, Bill.Oxley at cox.com allegedly wrote:
>> You believe both and apply a receiver policy determined by yourself that
>> will handle a message with an anomaly,
> 
> I'm with John on this. I don't see any merit in constructing a system
> that allows anomalies soley for the purpose of giving a receiver less
> certainty and more work to do.

+1

d/
-- 

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net