[ietf-dkim] Requirements on how SSP stuff is found...

[Arvel Hathcock]

 > But the SSP client is not the naive user - its a DKIM-verifier. Does
 > that change the argument? E.g. in terms of requiring consideration of
 > other "identities" or "domains" found in the message? (Just asking.)

If an SSP client could consider other identities/domains found within 
the message and that consideration could assist in determining the 
authentic/non-authentic question then yes that would be very useful 
input for a verifier.  I'd be all for it.  I hope I understood the 
question correctly :)

-- 
Arvel