[ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms
ietf-dkim at kitterman.com
Mon Jul 31 07:58:00 PDT 2006
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:02:07 -0400 (EDT) John L <johnl at iecc.com> wrote:
>I have to say that the more discussion I see from advocates of SSP, the
>less I think that anyone really understands what it's supposed to do.
>So here's the main SSP axiom that I think should be self-evident, but
>apparently isn't: other than the trivial (but useful) case of I send no
>mail, the most that SSP can tell you is that a signature is missing.
I take it then that you see distinguishing between first party and third
party signatures as either being of no value or not being feasible?
I ask because from my perspective, that is an essential feature for a
policy protocol to have significant utility.
More information about the ietf-dkim