[ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing

[John L]

> You believe both and apply a receiver policy determined by yourself that
> will handle a message with an anomaly,

What is the benefit of allowing people to publish SSP statements that are 
either self-evident or wrong?

> If I have a message with your valid 3rd party signature, meaning that
> you've published the key, and your SSP says you sign only your own mail,
>
> which do I believe?  Why or why not?

Regards,
John Levine, johnl at iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://johnlevine.com, Mayor
"I dropped the toothpaste", said Tom, crestfallenly.