[ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing

[Bill.Oxley at cox.com]

You believe both and apply a receiver policy determined by yourself that
will handle a message with an anomaly,

Bill Oxley 
Messaging Engineer 
Cox Communications, Inc. 
Alpharetta GA 
404-847-6397 
bill.oxley at cox.com 

-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of John L
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 9:43 AM
To: william(at)elan.net
Cc: DKIM List
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing

> The statement that I sign only my own mail makes perfect sense.

If I have a message with your valid 3rd party signature, meaning that 
you've published the key, and your SSP says you sign only your own mail,

which do I believe?  Why or why not?

Regards,
John Levine, johnl at iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for
Dummies",
Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://johnlevine.com, Mayor
"I dropped the toothpaste", said Tom, crestfallenly.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html