[ietf-dkim] Requirements on where/how SSP stuff is published...

[Michael Thomas]

Dave Crocker wrote:

>Jim Fenton wrote:
>  
>
>>Stephen Farrell wrote:
>>I'll throw out a few generic requirements:
>>    
>>
>
>Jim, these all look pretty reasonable, but they are all about the mechanism
>rather than being about sender signing practices, per se.
>
>  
>
True, but we do need to get both discovery and transport requirements
out in the open too. I have some sections for them in my draft I'm working
on.

       Mike