[ietf-dkim] Requirements on where/how SSP stuff is published...
mike at mtcc.com
Sun Jul 30 16:08:27 PDT 2006
Dave Crocker wrote:
>Jim Fenton wrote:
>>Stephen Farrell wrote:
>>I'll throw out a few generic requirements:
>Jim, these all look pretty reasonable, but they are all about the mechanism
>rather than being about sender signing practices, per se.
True, but we do need to get both discovery and transport requirements
out in the open too. I have some sections for them in my draft I'm working
More information about the ietf-dkim