[ietf-dkim] 3rd party signing

[Bill.Oxley at cox.com]

A recipient will then have a valid party to complain to which is better
than blocking a domain that has been spoofed.
Thanks,

Bill Oxley 
Messaging Engineer 
Cox Communications, Inc. 
Alpharetta GA 
404-847-6397 
bill.oxley at cox.com 

-----Original Message-----
From: John Levine [mailto:johnl at iecc.com] 
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 12:17 AM
To: ietf-dkim at mipassoc.org
Cc: Oxley, Bill (CCI-Atlanta)
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy
options

>As an example, an ISP that has 10k business customers who potentially
>will want signed mail a Commercial.isp.com signing domain would
>assert I only sign 3rd party

It may well be true that you only sign third party mail, but I still
don't understand what use a recipient might make of that information.

If they get unwanted mail from someone and you've signed it, they'll
complain to you regardless.

R's,
John