[ietf-dkim] How to proceed with SSP

[J.D. Falk]

On 2006-07-26 07:41, Arvel Hathcock wrote:
>  > Dave suggested in Montréal, to the agreement of at least some
>  > (including the chairs), that we have to step back and sort out SSP
>  > *requirements* before we can do an SSP specification.
> 
> I am in full agreement with this plan and am happy to see that an 
> approach is being managed and is well thought out.  You're right, what 
> SSP ends up looking like is anyone's guess at this point but with a 
> pre-determined requirements doc to work from it will help the process 
> greatly.

+1

Policy is different things to different people -- and like many 
social/legal/political constructs, the same policy can contradict itself 
without being invalid.  This won't be an easy consensus to find.

-- 
J.D. Falk, Anti-Spam Product Manager
Yahoo! Communications Platform Team