[ietf-dkim] How to proceed with SSP

[Arvel Hathcock]

 > Dave suggested in Montréal, to the agreement of at least some
 > (including the chairs), that we have to step back and sort out SSP
 > *requirements* before we can do an SSP specification.

I am in full agreement with this plan and am happy to see that an 
approach is being managed and is well thought out.  You're right, what 
SSP ends up looking like is anyone's guess at this point but with a 
pre-determined requirements doc to work from it will help the process 
greatly.

-- 
Arvel