[ietf-dkim] Re: Relaxed Body Canon

[John L]

>> down the line, be sure it's perfectly 2822 conformant and use a relaxed
>> signature.
>> 
> So we've been running relaxed body canonicalization on one of our production
> servers, and I can't say that I've seen any evidence that it is any better 
> than simple.

So I guess the smashed CR's aren't a problem, are they?

Regards,
John Levine, johnl at iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://johnlevine.com, Mayor
"I dropped the toothpaste", said Tom, crestfallenly.